Home

UK news

milkshake

Member
Gas watching the normies (both 'left' and 'right') arguing the ins and outs of this 😆

Rwanda is a safe country. Why are we not putting African refugees directly on a flight to Rwanda rather than having them go through the asylum system here. For one, the climate would suit them better, and it would be easier to stay in contact with, and have, family visits. Sounds like a win.
 
Haha.. Parlon still does have the knack of writing a good post :)

One of Gaychat's premier leftist insults to human intelligence ('Hewson') in the Rwanda thread writes:

The solution to illegal immigration is to make the home country of the immigrant economically viable. Might be rocket science in your head but it's really quite simple.

Parlon:

Extraordinary. An absolutely head-the-ball response. "You are to put up with not having any say over who comes to live in your country until you spend the trillions required to bring the source country to a level of economic prosperity sufficient to discourage illegal immigration from it. Until then you are to clothe, feed and house unlimited numbers of mostly unemployable and unskilled people who choose your country for their new home."
 
Haha.. Parlon still does have the knack of writing a good post :)

One of Gaychat's premier leftist insults to human intelligence ('Hewson') in the Rwanda thread writes:

The solution to illegal immigration is to make the home country of the immigrant economically viable. Might be rocket science in your head but it's really quite simple.

Parlon:

Extraordinary. An absolutely head-the-ball response. "You are to put up with not having any say over who comes to live in your country until you spend the trillions required to bring the source country to a level of economic prosperity sufficient to discourage illegal immigration from it. Until then you are to clothe, feed and house unlimited numbers of mostly unemployable and unskilled people who choose your country for their new home."
Baha!

And now Cowardly Con wades in with his boomer size sevens in reply to Parlon's post -

Worked for the USA. Except the USA never offered to feed or house them.

I literally told Con the other day that immigration to the US was restricted up until the Hart-Celler Act (1965)


Early legislation tended to impose limits that favored Europeans, but a sweeping 1965 law opened doors to immigrants from other parts of the world.

So Parlon correctly corrects him (without being specific) -

Almost precisely. A social welfare state. Open borders. Make up your mind as you can't have both. The US's borders when open to immigration were not open to everyone. Unlike the situation we have today.

And then in typically dishonest fashion (and talk about shifting the goalposts) Cowardly Con replies -

Not the situation today either. As you well know.

🤦‍♂️
 
I have told my friend Boris that we would be happy to take all these vigorous young men into Ukraine, to fight in our army; we could have a special "asylum seeker" regiment.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top Bottom